Everybody is busy bashing rating agencies and I am no
exception. Only yesterday I was telling my colleagues why a time will come when
these agencies would go out of business. Recently it was emphasised in the G20
meet also that reliance on rating agencies should be reduced. (see The Hindu
article)
The best rebuttal of these agencies came from the markets
which reflected the irrelevance of these ratings in the yield rates. The US
bond yields went down after a downgrade and so was the case in UK recently.
(see Bloomberg
article)
Indian ministers would certainly be happy with this
antagonism towards the rating trio – they are an apt scapegoat to blame and to
divert the nation from what is ailing the Indian economy. However, would the
Indian economy be doing any better if the agencies didn’t exist? I am not sure.
Each economic unit (household, companies, labour, etc.) is a
de facto rating agency in an economy. If a household is gloomy because of high
inflation it would impact growth by lowering demand. If a company is skeptical
of growth in the days to come it will pass on the scepticism to its suppliers,
its employees and so on. So if the economic units are feeling low about the
economy, only positive policy actions or positive external shocks can help the
economy and ratings aren’t that relevant.
So ignore the rating downgrades if you wish but do not
ignore issues like increasing fiscal deficit on the back of irresponsible
policies, poor governance, policy paralysis, and infrastructure constraints to
name a few that hurt the confidence of the consumer as well as the investor in
the Indian economy. You can ridicule 3 rating agencies but ridiculing each
economic unit’s sentiment should be done at one’s own peril.
No comments:
Post a Comment