The Brazil Development Bank (BNDES) plays an important role
in the country’s infrastructure development process especially when the
country’s budgeting process leaves little room for discretionary spending.
The word ‘development’[i],
however, has a very broad bearing in the case of BNDES since it lends not just
for infrastructure development but also to private companies that it perceives
to have a strong business model. In fact 60% of the bank’s loan portfolio
comprises large companies.[ii]
China similarly has the China Development Bank (CDB) which
in fact is much bigger in scale[iii]
and size than the BNDES[iv]
(see figure below). That left me wondering if there is a comparable bank in
India with similar objectives and one that could help the country realise its
$1 trillion infrastructure target by 2017.
A close examination, however, suggests that there is no such
bank of comparable stature dedicated exclusively to development needs. Sectoral
development banks like NABARD try to do the job; however, such banks are
present in China and Brazil too in addition to the gigantic development centric
banks.
Country
|
Main Development Bank/s[v]
|
Brazil
|
Banco Nacional de Desenvolvimento Economico e Social - BNDES
|
Russia
|
State Corporation Bank for Development and Foreign Economic Affairs –
Vnesheconombank
|
India
|
Trade - EXIM Bank
Industrial - IFCI, SIDBI, IDBI
Agriculture – NABARD
Housing – NHB
Infrastructure – IDFC, IL&FS, IIFCL
|
China
|
China Development Bank Corporation
|
South Africa
|
Development Bank of Southern Africa
|
The State Bank of India and other nationalised Indian banks do
contribute to development lending; however, the scale of such lending cannot
compete with CDB or BNDES with the total assets of SBI almost equal to the
BNDES.[vi]
That brings us to the question that do we need such a
mammoth development bank? From an infrastructure perspective, a report by PwC
in 2007[vii]
shows that commercial banks (mainly public sector) and the other development
banks together finance more than 90% of the total infrastructure financing.
Figure 1- India Infrastructure Finance (PwC/World Bank,
2007)
However, going forward, the capacity of the commercial banks
to fund long term infrastructure debt has saturated and there is a need for
alternative finance. Infrastructure bonds with tax incentives are now being
floated in to the market but their contribution to total debt requirement is
limited.
[i]“Brazil:
A bank too big to be beautiful,” FT, September 2012, http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/983f1bca-0234-11e2-b41f-00144feabdc0.html#axzz2X7C1DtQS
[ii] “Nest egg or serpent’s egg,” The
Economist, August 2010, http://www.economist.com/node/16748990
[iii] “(Almost)
all you need to know about China Development Bank,” FT, May 2013, http://blogs.ft.com/beyond-brics/2013/05/29/qa-almost-all-you-need-to-know-about-china-development-bank/#axzz2XDln6iEB
[iv] “Brazil’s
BNDES and Caixa hit by downgrades,” FT, March 2013, http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/0a07be4c-924f-11e2-851f-00144feabdc0.html#axzz2X7C1DtQS
[vi] “My conflicted heart – the struggle
for the soul of India’s largest bank,” The Economist, April 2012, http://www.economist.com/node/21553039
[vii] “Infrastructure Financing in India,”
PwC, 2007, http://toolkit.pppinindia.com/pdf/infrastructure-financing-india.pdf
No comments:
Post a Comment